Journal Search Engine

View PDF Download PDF Export Citation Korean Bibliography PMC Previewer
ISSN : 1738-1894(Print)
ISSN : 2288-5471(Online)
Journal of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology Vol. No. pp.2-2
DOI : https://doi.org/10.7733/jnfcwt.2025.009

Evaluation of uranium-removal characteristics from soil-washed wastewater using precipitation methods

Maengkyo Oh1*, Jun-Young Jung1, Byung-Moon Jun3, Keunyoung Lee2, Hee-Chul Eun1
1Radwaste Management Center, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI), 111 Daedeok-daero 989beon-gil, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34057, Republic of Korea
2Decommissioning Technology Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI), 111 Daedeok-daero 989beon-gil, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34057, Republic of Korea
3Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Kyung Hee University, 1732 Deogyeong-Daero, Giheung-gu, Yongin-si, Gyeonggi-do 17104, Republic of Korea
2025-01-24 ; 2025-03-04 ; 2025-03-17

Abstract

Uranium-contaminated soil can be effectively decontaminated through acid leaching; however, this process process generates significant amounts of radioactive wastewater. Therefore, developing efficient methods to remove uranium from wastewater is essential to minimize radioactive waste generation. This study investigates the applicability of various precipitation methods for uranium removal from acidic wastewater produced during soil-washing processes. Three methods were evaluated: metal hydroxide (M–OHx) co-precipitation, uranium peroxide (UO₄) precipitation, and uranium phosphate (KUO2PO4) precipitation. The M–OHx precipitation method removes uranium by precipitating excess metal ions in wastewater by adjusting the pH. This method is easy to use and has a high removal efficiency. The UO4 and KUO2PO4 precipitation methods involve adding reagents to precipitate uranium in the mineral phase. They enable selective uranium separation and further volume reduction. In the results, M–OHx and KUPO₄ precipitation methods remove uranium to less than 1 mg∙L−1 within 2 h, demonstrating superior capabilities compared to UO₄ precipitation. The optimal method is different depended on the management strategy for the recovered uranium. The M–OHx precipitation method was suitable for permanent disposal, whereas KUO2PO4 could be recycled. Based on these findings, guidelines for the effective treatment of wastewater containing uranium from the soil-washing process can be established.

초록


     

    Figures

    Tables

    References

    Editorial Office
    Contact Information

    - Tel: +82-42-861-5851, 866-4157
    - Fax: +82-42-861-5852
    - E-mail: krs@krs.or.kr

    SCImago Journal & Country Rank