Journal Search Engine
Download PDF Export Citation Korean Bibliography PMC Previewer
ISSN : 1738-1894(Print)
ISSN : 2288-5471(Online)
Journal of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology Vol.19 No.1 pp.133-140
DOI : https://doi.org/10.7733/jnfcwt.2021.19.1.133

A Study on the Evaluation of Surface Dose Rate of New Disposal Containers Though the Activation Evaluation of Bio-Shield Concrete Waste From Kori Unit 1

Gi-Woong Kang, Rin-Ah Kim, Ho-Seok Do, Tae-Man Kim*, Chun-Hyung Cho
Korea Radioactive Waste Agency, 174, Gajeong-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
* Corresponding Author. Tae-Man Kim, Korea Radioactive Waste Agency, E-mail: teddybear@korad.or.kr, Tel: +82-42-601-5387

November 30, 2020 ; December 21, 2020 ; January 28, 2021

Abstract


This study evaluates the radioactivity of concrete waste that occurs due to large amounts of decommissioned nuclear wastes and then determines the surface dose rate when the waste is packaged in a disposal container. The radiation assessment was conducted under the presumption that impurities included in the bio-shielded concrete contain the highest amount of radioactivity among all the concrete wastes. Neutron flux was applied using the simplified model approach in a sample containing the most Co and Eu impurities, and a maximum of 9.8×104 Bq·g−1 60Co and 2.63×105 Bq·g−1 152Eu was determined. Subsequently, the surface dose rate of the container was measured assuming that the bio-shield concrete waste would be packaged in a newly developed disposal container. Results showed that most of the concrete wastes with a depth of 20 cm or higher from the concrete surface was found to have less than 1.8 mSv·hr−1 in the surface dose of the new-type disposal container. Hence, when bio-shielded concrete wastes, having the highest radioactivity, is disposed in the new disposal container, it satisfies the limit of the surface dose rate (i.e., 2 mSv·hr−1) as per global standards.



초록


    Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning(KETEP)
    20193210100120 Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy(Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, Korea)

    1. Introduction

    The first in Kori Unit 1 was permanently shut-down in June 2017, starting from that, a total of 12 NPPs are expected to be shut-down by 2030. Kori Unit 1, which is currently shutdown permanently, will begin decommissioning in 2026 and is scheduled to be dismantled completely in 2032. Currently, there is no experience of decommissioning commercial nuclear power plants in Korea, but only two experiences of decommissioning research nuclear power plants. Against in preparation for the decommissioning of nuclear power plants which will increase rapidly thereafter, many studies are being carried out on the characteristic evaluation of generated radioactive waste during decommissioning. During Kori 1 decommissioning, the total amount of generated radioactive concrete is expected to be 998.4 tons, of which 549.6 tons (55%) for very low level wastes and 448.8 (45%) tons for low level wastes [1].

    There are advanced studies on the concrete radioactivity evaluation and neutron flux, and those were conducted several times. Based on the advanced studies, the study aims to calculate the nuclear inventory of nuclear wastes through the radioactive evaluation of the nuclear decommissioning concrete wastes, and as the results, we would want to evaluate the amount of the waste disposal containers currently being developed in the country, and the surface radiation dose rate. In addition, we would like to review whether it can satisfy the “less than 10 mSv·hr−1 on the surface” criteria presented in the current acceptance criteria, and whether it satisfies the surface dose limit (less than 2 mSv·hr−1) of overseas disposal containers.

    2. Evaluation methods

    2.1 Analysis on the characteristics of decommissioning wastes of overseas commercial nuclear power plants

    First, overseas cases with experience in decommissioning commercial nuclear power plants are reviewed. The amount of concrete wastes accounted for 84% of the total amount of wastes at the Connecticut Yankee nuclear power plant. In the case of the Maine Yankee nuclear power plant, 63,485 tons of radioactive concrete waste were generated. Whereas in the case of Trojan nuclear power plant, it confirmed that only 284 tons were generated. As you can be seen in the case of Trojan, there is no significant correlation between the output of the reactor and the operating period of the amount of waste generated.

    The above overseas cases shown can be confirmed that concrete accounts for the most of the wastes generated during the nuclear decommissioning. A number of metals are also generated as the concrete being coincided. it is difficult to predict the waste radionuclide inventory in disposal standpoint, because generated metal wastes during nuclear decommissioning will be melted by molten treatment. The radioactivity is dispersed and all residual nuclides are uniformly distributed and immobilized, so that radioactivity can be accurately measured from each ingot sample after the molten treatment.

    Concrete is divided into surface-contaminated concrete and radioactive concrete. In the case of surface-contaminated concrete, it is partially reduced through decontamination before decommissioning. Therefore, the evaluation target of the study is conducted on radioactive concrete with less variation in the amount of nuclides depending on the treatment process.

    2.2 Properties of radioactive concrete waste

    According to domestic and overseas, among impurities contained in concrete, 60Co, 152Eu, and 154Eu nuclides have a key effect on the production of radionuclides, so these must be considered when evaluating the radioactivity of concrete [8, 9]. Based on the analysis results of the Eu content in the domestic natural mineral aggregate conducted in Korea, the difference between the lowest and highest values was about 44 times from the lowest 0.036 ppm (Samcheok limestone, Gangwon) to the highest 1.587 ppm (Wando iron ore, Jeonnam), and 0.39 ppm on average [10]. As shown by this result, since the impurity content ratio varies greatly depending on the aggregate used, the radioactivity evaluation must be performed including the measured impurities as much as possible.

    2.3 Radioactive evaluation method

    As described in the previous section, it is necessary to evaluate the radioactivity by utilizing the impurity information of the measured concrete waste, but it is difficult to perform analysis by directly collecting samples at the current decommissioning planning stage. We used information on impurities in previous research cases, and evaluated activation of concrete using computer codes. MCNP used for calculating the neutron flux and the surface radiation dose rate, and the ORIGEN module of SACLE 6.2 used for conducting the radioactivity evaluation.

    2.4 Evaluation method of surface radiation dose rate

    Among the decommissioning waste disposal containers currently under development, there are two types of containers that can hold concrete wastes: medium-1 containers and large containers [16].

    The medium-1 container is a metal container with a lid and floor of 5 mm thick and a side of 3 mm thick, and subject to concrete, metal, and miscellaneous low-level waste with weight below 35 tons. Radioactive concrete and miscellaneous wastes weight less than 16 tons even if 100% loaded in a medium-1 container, so the waste was modeled as packed no empty space in the container during the shielding evaluation.

    The large container is a metal container with a lid and a floor of 5 mm and a side of 3 mm. Loadable wastes are subject to low-density decommissioning wastes without restriction, and the very low level waste. When the radioactivity level of the waste to be packaged is lower than the low level, such as the medium-sized container described above, the most conservative result can be obtained by conducting the shielding evaluation by assuming the radio- activity concentration of the waste as limit of low level so that all low level radioactive waste can be packaged.

    The soft bag was developed to be disposed of in a large type container for very low level concrete or soil waste, and its specifications are (W)1.1 m, (L)1.4 m, (H)1 m.

    The MCNP 6.2 code used to evaluate the surface dose rate of the disposal container uses the Monte Carlo method, which is a stochastic/statistical method, and is a program that allows modeling and analysis similar to actual phenomenon for a three-dimensional geometric structure. The code contains a variety of nuclear reaction libraries, which are based on ENDF/B-VII, 1 libraries in MCNP 6.2. The resulting value of the MCNP code is calculated by the number of particles per unit area and the dose rate cannot be directly evaluated. Therefore, the radiation dose rate is derived using the flux to dose conversion factor after calculating the area of interest, the particle flux at the container surface and 2 m point through the calculation of the MCNP computer code. The conversion factor for the flux-dose ratio was based on the data in ICRP-74.

    3. Evaluation result

    3.1 Evaluation result of radioactivity

    The purpose of the study is to estimate the surface radiation dose rate of a new disposal containers by conducting radiation assessment according to impurities content, so the specific MCNP modelling for Kori unit-1 was simplified and calculated. There can be differences in calculated values from other reference documents because many assumptions have been put in to simplify geometries. The inner diameter of the RV, RVIs, and bio-concrete is mostly composed of concentric circles, and only the nuclear fuel area and baffle are composed of a grid. Therefore, in this study, the model was set up by simplifying the nuclear fuel and baffle area into a circle structure equal to the area of the grid structure, similar to the method widely used when simplifying the reactor core model. As a result of the calculation, the highest 1.42×1012 flux to the lowest 6.73×102 flux were calculated.

    As such, the principal radioactive nuclei in the application of impurities in concrete materials are 152Eu, 154Eu, and 60Co. 100% of 152Eu nuclides are generated by the radiation of 151Eu and 100% of 154Eu nuclides are also generated by the radiation of 153Eu. 100% of 60Co nuclides are also generated by the radiation of 59Co an impurity in concrete. In other words, the impact of impurities is dominant in the calculation of concrete radioactivity. Thus, the study was calculated by referring to the documents and applying the impurity content of the parent nuclide of the nuclide in question.

    For the evaluation of radioactivity, it is necessary to review of the time when radionuclides are produced and when they are packaged and disposed of, taking into ac- count half-life. Although Kori Unit 1 is scheduled to be approved for decommission in 2022, five years after its permanent shut-down, the decommissioning work will be carried out in earnest after the spent fuel is taken out even after the dismantlement approval is granted. Since the planned date for export of spent nuclear fuel is 2025, it is assumed that waste will be generated from 2027, 10 years after the permanent shut-down, not 2022. That is, 10 years after the permanent shutdown of Kori Unit 1, it is the concentration of the nuclide considering the half-life, which is the result calculated through ORIGEN-S.

    The content of 60Co, 152Eu, and 154Eu is as above.

    3.2 Evaluation of disposal container surface dose ratio

    For medium-sized containers was assumed that the total weight was 14.7 ton, large-sized containers (soft-bag) was 19.9 ton, and large-sized containers without soft-bag was 33 ton.

    The results of evaluating the surface dose rate of a new disposal container packed with a bio-shield concrete waste using MCNP are as above. In the case of impurities 1 to 4, it can be found that all depths except 20–40 cm depth satisfy the foreign reference value of 2 mSv·hr−1. In the case of impurity 5, it was confirmed that the reference value was satisfied from 40 cm depth in the medium-1 container.

    When composed of the activation waste generated in a section less than 0–40 cm from the inner surface of the bio-shield, the surface dose was analyzed to be 2 mSv·hr−1 or more in all containers. However, in the section of 40 cm or more, it was analyzed to be less than 2 mSv·hr−1, and the deeper the depth, the very low dose was analyzed. According to reference [10], it is described that an additional shielding liner (made by concrete) is formed inside the medium-sized container according to the intensity of the surface dose, or the concentration is reduced for a sufficient time in the separate storage facility.

    4. Conclusion

    The study evaluated the radioactivity of concrete waste, which is expected to occur in the largest amount of nuclear power plant decommissioned waste and the surface dose rate when it is packaged in a disposal container.

    First of all, the radiation assessment was conducted on the condition that impurities were included in the bio-shield concrete that is expected to contain the largest amount of radioactivity among concrete wastes. As a result, decommissioned concrete wastes except to bio-shield concrete is considered to clearance waste level. The amount of activated concrete waste generated by the decommissioning of Kori Unit 1 is determined by the evaluation of radioactivity based on the results of analysis through direct sampling collection. Accordingly, the number of new containers required will also be determined according to the amount of waste generated.

    Subsequently, the surface dose rate of the container was measured assuming that the bio-shield concrete wastes generated during the decommissioning of the nuclear power plant would be packaged in a newly developed disposal container. As a result, the bio-shield concrete meeting the current domestic acceptance criteria is 247,412 kg, accounting for 52% of the total bio-shield concrete waste. In particular, it was confirmed that the outer bio-shield concrete after 120cm from the inner surface can be classified into clearance waste level.

    Through the study, it was confirmed that most wastes were satisfied with the application of 2 mSv·hr−1 limit of surface dose rate of the foreign disposal containers to new disposal containers. In particular, it seems to be that the safety efficiency will be ensured if only a portion of excess waste is withdrawn for disposal after storage for a certain period of time considering half-life.

    However, the inventory of impurities based on the actual measurement of wastes from Kori Unit 1 concrete, which is the most important part of the evaluation of radioactivity, has not been secured yet. Moreover, there has not been presented any ascertainable methods on the solidification requirements of radioactive wastes in the new disposal container and the internal homogeneity so far. It will thus be performed thereafter by the evaluation based on the actual measurement data on the nuclide composition of the structure and the homogeneous validity of the inside of the container due to the solidification. It is regarded as that the disposal process of nuclear decommissioning waste can be implemented safely and efficiently through above the suggestion.

    Acknowledgement

    This work was supported by the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP Project No. 20193210100120) and the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea.

    Figures

    JNFCWT-19-1-133_F1.gif

    The concept design of the new-type disposal containers and soft-bag.

    JNFCWT-19-1-133_F2.gif

    Kori unit 1 RV, RVI, and bio-shield concrete geometry modeling.

    Tables

    The overseas cases of decommissioning concrete

    Impurity of bio-shield concrete

    Evaluation result of neutron flux [#·cm−2·sec−1]

    Evaluation results of major nuclides according to impurities

    Surface radiation dose rate of medium-1 container [mSv·hr−1]

    Surface radiation dose rate of large (soft-bag) container [mSv·hr−1]

    Surface radiation dose rate of large container [mSv·hr−1]

    References

    1. Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Co., Ltd. Development of NPP Decommissioning Source Terms Evaluation Technology, Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power Reports (2016).
    2. Electric Power Research Institute. Maine Yankee Decommissioning– Experience Report: Detailed Experiences 1997–2004, Electric Power Research Institute Report (2005).
    3. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Inventory of Materials with Very Low Levels of Radioactivity Potentially Clearable from Various Types of Fa cilities, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Inventory Report (2001).
    4. K.Y. Lee, M.K. Oh, J.M. Kim, E.H. Lee, I.S. Kim, K.W. Kim, D.Y. Chung, and B.K. Seo, “Trends in Technology Development for the Treatment of Radioactive Concrete Waste”, J. Nucl. Fuel Cycle Waste Technol., 16(1), 93-105 (2018).
    5. Dominion Energy Kewaunee, Inc. Kewaunee Power Station Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Report. Rev 0, Dominion Energy Kewaunee Report, 50-305 (2013).
    6. ZionSolutions, LLC. Zion Station Restoration Project: License Termination Plan Revision 2, ZionSolutions Report, 50-295 & 50-304 and 72-1037 (2018).
    7. H. Larsson, A. Anunti, and E. Mathias. Decommissioning Study of Oskarshamn NPP, Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB Tecnical Report, SKB-R-13-04 (2013).
    8. B.Y. Min, J.W. Park, W.K. Choi, and K.W. Lee, “Separation of Radionuclide from Dismantled Concrete Waste”, J. Nucl. Fuel Cycle Waste Technol., 7(2), 79-86 (2009).
    9. G.Y. Cha, S.Y. Kim, J.M. Lee, and Y.S. Kim, “The Effects of Impurity Composition and Concen-Tration in Reactor Structure Material on Neutron Activation Inventory in Pressurized Water Reactor”, J. Nucl. Fuel Cycle Waste Technol., 14(2), 91-100 (2016).
    10. J.S. Lee, J.Y. Min, K.N. Jeon, and B.N. Lee, “Activation Properties to Aggregates Type for Low-Activation Concrete”, AURIC 26(2) (2014).
    11. J.C. Evans, E.L. Lepel, R.W. Sanders, C.L. Wilkerson, W. Silker, , C.W. Thomas, K.H. Abel, and D.R. Robertson. Long Lived Activation Products in Reactor Materials, Pacific Northwest Laboratory Technical Report, NUREG/CR-3474 (1984).
    12. T. Zager, M. Bozic, and M. Ravnik, “Long-Lived Activation Products in TRIGA Mark II Research Reactor Concrete Shield: Calculation and Experiment”, J. Nucl. Mater., 335(3), 379-386 (2004).
    13. K. Masumoto, A. Toyoda, K. Eda, Y. Izumi, and T. Shibata, “Evaluation of Radioactivity Induced in the Accelerator Building and its Application to Decontamination work”, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem, 255, 465-469 (2003).
    14. G. Hampel, F. Scheller, W. Bernnart, G. Pfister, U. Klaus, and E. Gerhards, “Calculation of the Activity Inventory for the TRIGA Reactor at the Medical University of Hannover (HMM) in Preparation for Dismantling the Facility”, WM Symposia, Inc., Vol.35, February 24-28, 2002, Tucson, Arizona.
    15. Nuclear Study and Security Commission. Development of Radiation Safety Control Technology for a Giant Radiation Factory, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission Report, MONO120141529 (2013).
    16. Korea Radioactive Waste Agency. Development of Waste Package, Transportation and Disposal Containers for Decommissioning Wastes of Nuclear Power Plant, Korea Radioactive Waste Agency Technical Report (2019).
    1. SEARCH
    2. JNFCWT

      Online Submission

    3. Korean Radioactive
      Waste Society (KRS)

    4. Editorial Office
      Contact Information

      - Tel: +82-42-861-5851, 866-4205
      - Fax: +82-42-861-5852
      - E-mail: krs@krs.or.kr