Journal Search Engine
Download PDF Export Citation Korean Bibliography PMC Previewer
ISSN : 1738-1894(Print)
ISSN : 2288-5471(Online)
Journal of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology Vol.18 No.4 pp.439-455

Simulation of the Migration of 3H and 14C Radionuclides on the 2nd Phase Facility at the Wolsong LILW Disposal Center

Jaechul Ha*, Yuhwa Son, Chunhyung Cho
Korea Radioactive Waste Agency, 174, Gajeong-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
Corresponding Author. Jaechul Ha, Korea Radioactive Waste Agency, E-mail:, Tel: +82-42-601-5353
August 12, 2020 ; August 26, 2020 ; October 9, 2020


Numerical model was developed that simulates radionuclide (3H and 14C) transport modeling at the 2nd phase facility at the Wolsong LILW Disposal Center. Four scenarios were simulated with different assumptions about the integrity of the components of the barrier system. For the design case, the multi-barrier system was shown to be effective in diverting infiltration water around the vaults containing radioactive waste. Nevertheless, the volatile radionuclide 14C migrates outside the containment system and through the unsaturated zone, driven by gas diffusion. 3H is largely contained within the vaults where it decays, with small amounts being flushed out in the liquid state. Various scenarios were examined in which the integrity of the cover barrier system or that of the concrete were compromised. In the absence of any engineered barriers, 3H is washed out to the water table within the first 20 years. The release of 14C by gas diffusion is suppressed if percolation fluxes through the facility are high after a cover failure. However, the high fluxes lead to advective transport of 14C dissolved in the liquid state. The concrete container is an effective barrier, with approximately the same effectiveness as the cover.


    Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning(KETEP)

    1. Introduction

    The assessment of the 2nd phase disposal facility for the safe long-term storage of radioactive wastes critically depends on the performance of (1) the engineered containment system, and (2) the natural, geologic system underlying the repository. The inventory of radionuclides, their mobilization and release from the repository, and their transport through the unsaturated zone (UZ) to the groundwater table and eventually to the accessible environment are key factors and processes affecting the long-term performance of the system [1, 2].

    The objective of the study is to evaluate the radionuclide transport simulations, focusing on examining the release and migration of tritium (3H) and volatile radiocarbon (14C). Radionuclides transport analysis were performed based on the previous results [3], and domains were constructed based on the cell-centered finite volume method for numerical analysis [4], and the mass and energy conservation equations of each grid were analyzed. The EOS7r module of TOUGH2 code was used to track the physical characteristics of water-air-radionuclides and the movement of radionuclides dissolved groundwater [5], and Tecplot was used as a post-processing program to visualize the modeling results [6].

    2. Simulations

    2.1 Model assumptions

    In order to model the radionuclide transport, it is necessary to consider the phenomenon of dissolving and moving in groundwater, so groundwater flow must also be considered. Since the groundwater flow in this study was referenced under the same conditions as in the previous study. In the previous study, groundwater flow was simulated including a series of artificial and natural barriers to the disposal vault, unsaturated zone and saturated zone in the lower part of the repository, including the cover of the repository to be installed after the closure of the second-phase disposal facility. As shown in Table 1, the material property values of the eight multiple cover layers constituting the cover were not experimental or measured values, but assumed values were used.

    The simulations are concerned with the fate of two radionuclides: tritium (3H) and carbon-14 (14C). Basic properties of these two isotopes are shown in Table 1. Both isotopes are contained in the waste being stored at Wolsong. However, the specific location, chemical form, and partitioning between the solid, liquid and gas phases, are unknown. It can be assumed that the bulk of the radionuclide activity is contained in solid material comprising the waste. The process by which these isotopes (or molecules that underwent an oxidation or exchange reaction with an isotope) are transported from within the material to its surface (e.g., by solid diffusion) is essential as it determines the rate (equilibrium or kinetic) with which it becomes available for desorption, dissolution into groundwater, evaporation into gas, or direct outgassing from the solid phase [8].

    Moreover, the partitioning between the liquid and gas phase determines the process and thus mobility with which the radionuclides are transported out of the containment system from where they migrate through the natural system either to the atmosphere, groundwater, or a surface water body [9].

    Most of these critical processes and associated parameters are currently unknown for the specific conditions at Wolsong. This lack of information is dealt with by (a) making assumptions that are either considered reasonable or conservative, and (b) reporting only relative isotope concentration values, as no defensible statements about activities in the various mobile phases can be made at this point.

    The following simplifying assumptions regarding radionuclide inventory and phase partitioning are made:

    • • The total activity of each of the two isotopes, 3H and 14C, is assumed to be emplaced uniformly throughout the waste vaults at time zero. This assumption may or may not be conservative, depending on the details of the interaction between the waste and fluids flowing through the vault.

    • • The bulk of the initial 14C mass is necessarily contained in the solid phase. This assumption results from the fact that the reported total activity far exceeds the mass that can reasonably be dissolved or vaporized in the liquid and gas phases present in the vault.

    • • Isotopes desorb from the solid waste matrix using a reversible, linear isotherm (Kd approach). This assumption is likely conservative. Solid diffusion is typically a very slow mechanism, which makes isotope release at the solid surface a ratelimited rather than equilibrium process.

    • • The water in contact with waste contains isotopes at their respective solubility limits. This assumption is likely conservative, as it maximizes the amount of radionuclides that can be transported in the liquid water.

    • • The partial pressure of the isotope in the gas phase is in equilibrium with the liquid concentration according to Henry’s Law [10]. This assumption is likely conservative, as it maximizes the amount of radionuclides that can be transported in the gas phase.

    • • Isotopes dissolved in the liquid phase or volatile isotopes are mobile and are transported by advection in each of the fluid phases and by saturation dependent multi-phase diffusion. The partitioning of the radionuclides in the liquid and gas phases, and the relative magnitude of advective versus diffusive fluxes within each of the two phases control the overall migration mass flux and velocity of the radionuclides.

    The phase partitioning coefficients of the radionuclides impact the migration mechanism, i.e., they determine whether a specific radionuclide is predominantly transported by advection in the liquid phase or diffusion in the gas phase. Moreover, the actual activity of a radionuclide depends on the (absolute) concentration in the given phase, along with the mass flow rate of that phase. For example, even a high relative concentration in the gas phase may have insignificant activity if the saturation and porosity at that location is low, or if the flow rate to a receptor is low.

    Despite the absence of accurate adsorption and phase partitioning coefficients for 14C and 3H, values are chosen that represent the expected behavior, specifically the fact that 14C may be volatile and thus be transported through the gas phase. In addition, the total inventory of a radionuclide in the waste vault shall be represented. To achieve this, the following approach was chosen to initialize radionuclides in the model:

    • • Both radionuclides are expected to be present in very small or even trace concentrations in the liquid phase, i.e., they do not affect the thermophysical properties of the fluids, and they are not affected by each other’s presence.

    • • An arbitrary (but small) mass fraction for 14C in the liquid phase of 10-7 is chosen to represent the initial 14C concentration in the liquid phase within the vault at time zero.

    • • A Henry coefficient of 1.67×108 Pa determines the mass fraction of 14C in the gas phase under equilibrium conditions. Such equilibrium conditions are assumed valid whenever both liquid and gas phases are present within the pore space.

    • • The total amount of (dissolved and gaseous) 14C present in a drum given is very small (on the order of 0.3 kg). To match the 14C inventory of approximately 2,000 kg per vault, a Kd value of 0.368 is chosen, which has the effect of generating the remaining amount of 14C as an adsorbed, solid phase into the vault.

    • • A 3H liquid mass fraction of 7.8×10-8 in combination with a Henry coefficient of 2,000 Pa (indicating that tritium predominantly resides in the liquid phase) is sufficient to initialize the entire tritium inventory of approximately 40 grams into the fluid phases present in a waste vault. It is likely that part of the tritium is contained in solid components of the waste; the assumption that the entire tritium inventory is available in the mobile fluid phases is thus conservative.

    Due to these many assumptions, model convergence was limited, and to solve this problem, modeling was optimized using iTOUGH2, an inverse code of TOUGH2 [11].

    2.2 Simulation scenarios

    As analysis scenarios, the nuclear species migration was evaluated for four scenarios derived from the two barriers of the disposal cover and vault. Multiple scenarios were set up and simulated to examine the design case as well as bounding configurations. The reference case is referred to as the design case, as it contains all the engineered features and properties. In particular, the cover consists of a sequence of layers that form multiple permeability and capillary barriers to divert infiltration water sideways, reducing the percolation flux encountered by the waste vault. The waste vault itself acts as an additional barrier, reducing water in-and outflows and radionuclide migration by advection and diffusion. It also provides structural strength and serves as a chemical barrier.

    The effectiveness of the engineered cover barrier is contingent on the integrity of each of the layers over the 300- year compliance period. This implies that the geometry and material properties, as well as the continuity and homogeneity of each of the layers remain intact. Even relatively minor disturbances of the design may lead to a breach of the barrier system, thus reducing the flow-diversion capacity of the cover system. As a result, higher percolation fluxes reach the vaults holding the radioactive waste.

    Similarly, the vaults may be breached, specifically through cracking or other degradation of the concrete. Table 2 summarizes the main four scenarios, which include the design cases (Case A) and three combinations of barrier failure. Additional scenarios (omitting multi-phase diffusion; assuming long-term averaged net infiltration) were also examined.

    2.3 Initial conditions and constraints

    It is normalized to the maximum concentration found in the waste storage vault, separate for each phase. The initial conditions for transport simulations are therefore by definition represented by relative concentrations of 1.0 in the vault, and 0.0 elsewhere, as shown in Fig. 1.

    As the condition of the model area, the top grids were set to a constant atmospheric pressure, thereby eliminating the possibility of affecting the disposal facility through pressure and mass transfer. In addition, the lowermost part of the domain was set to a constant head as a saturation region in order to prevent the reverse raising phenomenon causing saturation to the upper part of the unsaturated zone by inflow of groundwater. The rainfall conditions flowing into the disposal facility were used as input data for the multiple cover system by utilizing the water balance analysis data in the southern Ulsan area of the Korean peninsula [12]. In the total rainfall, 46.1% of rainfall infiltration was applied, excluding evapotranspiration, and the rainfall conditions for 300 years were set as the 30-year rainfall data were repeated 10 times.

    Performing coupled multiphase flow and transport simulations of five components (water, air, brine, 3H, and 14C) in a system with property contrasts that cover many orders of magnitude and a highly variable net infiltration rate that leads to many phase changes due to pulses of water migrating through the system is computationally very demanding and time-consuming. Results are therefore only obtained for relatively short simulation periods that depend on the numerical convergence behavior and time-stepping rates attainable for each case.

    3. Results and disccusion

    3.1 Case A

    The release and transport of partitioning radionuclides is a complex process that involves multi-component diffusion with phase partitioning, as well as advection in the gas and liquid phase driven by pressure gradients and density effects. Superimposed on these flow and transport processes is radioactive decay.

    The volatile 14C is released from the enclosed waste canisters predominantly by gas diffusion. It spreads throughout the vadose zone until it encounters a diffusion barrier such as the clay layers above, the water table at the bottom, and laterally the high-flux, high-saturation water curtain that develops at the edge of the repository due to the diversion of infiltrating water within the engineered cover system (Fig. 2). The 14C released by gas diffusion also partitions into the liquid phase according to Henry’s law, i.e., the presence of dissolved 14C relatively far away from the repository may have likely been transported through the gas phase. Advective transport is comparatively small in the shadow zone of the cover system.

    By contrast, the main mechanism for the release of 3H is liquid diffusion and should the barrier system be breached, advective transport. For the reference case, where the concrete vault is assumed to prevent water inflow, the low liquid diffusion coefficient (see Table 1) limits releases (note that relative concentrations are shown on a logarithmic scale in Fig. 3). 3H appears to be contained within the intact vault, where it decays. Due to the small release rates, the change of the 3H inventory in the vaults shows the exponential curve describing radioactive decay of 3H (see Fig. 4).

    After about 3 years, the diffusive transport of 14C reaches a first quasi-steady state, where the releases balance the amount being washed into the groundwater, and the amount of 14C residing in the vadose zone stabilizes (see Fig. 4 and Fig. 5). Releases to the atmosphere are comparatively small. Moreover, they diminish as gas diffusion is inhibited during the initial wetting of the cover system. No releases of 3H to either the atmosphere or water table were calculated.

    3.2 Case B

    Radionuclide releases from the vault is likely to depend on the integrity of the concrete vault. Diffusion in the gas phase is the main escape mechanism for 14C. The concrete is an effective barrier for gas diffusion mainly due to its strong capillarity, which ensures that the pores remain almost completely liquid saturated, reducing gas diffusion. In Case B, this diffusion barrier is absent, leading to a fast release of 14C, diffusing readily through the shadow zone towards the water table and through the initially unsaturated cover towards the atmosphere (Fig. 6). As previously discussed, the absolute concentrations of 14C in the gas and liquid phase depend on the Henry coefficient, which is not known for the 14C waste form stored at Wolsong.

    Release of 3H occurs predominantly by liquid diffusion, which is substantially small than gas diffusion (see Table 1). Fig. 7 shows that 3H migrates away from the vaults with the expected diffusive penetration depth, which is a function the square-root of time. Note that these simulations only show the early-time behavior with an intact cover barrier leading to very small advective transport. No 3H reaches the atmosphere or water table for the considered time frame. The advective component is more relevant for 3H, as will be mentioned in Case C.

    Due to the small release rates, the change of the 3H inventory reflects the decay, reducing the amount of 3H remaining in the vault by a factor of 2 every 12 years. Fig. 8 shows the exponential curve describing radioactive decay of 3H. By contrast, the change of the 14C inventory is almost entirely due to the diffusive release, which is initially very high because of the strong concentration gradient from the vault to the backfill. The release rate diminishes with time and approaches a near-steady flux that is equivalent to the rate with which 14C is washed into the water table (Fig. 9).

    Releases to the atmosphere are relatively small and decline as the cover becomes more liquid saturated within the first 5 years.

    3.3 Case C

    The initially relatively dry conditions around the vaults, and the arrival of the water front after about 2 years, have a strong impact on the 14C migration mechanism and resulting concentration distribution at early times, as shown in Fig. 10. The highly volatized 14C is instantly released from the waste vault by gas diffusion, spreading throughout the vadose zone and reading the water table in approximately 2 years. Note that lateral spreading beyond the footprint of the repository is inhibited by the higher liquid saturations encountered for X > 60 m. This transport behavior is similar to that seen in Cases A and B.

    Shortly after 2 years, however, the initial water pulse arriving at the horizon of the repository leads to high liquid saturations around the vault, thus curtailing 14C diffusion in the gas phase. The high water flux between the vaults effectively washes out the radionuclides. As the panels for 5, 10, and 30 years show, 14C is still being released by gas diffusion to the shadow zones beneath the vaults, where they are diluted by the percolating water that spreads horizontally due to capillary pressure gradients. No fundamental change in the transport mechanism occurs after 5 years. 14C content in the vaults is slowly depleted, with concentrations in the gas and liquid phases in the vadose zone changing slightly in response to the fluctuations in net infiltration, but essentially remaining constant over time.

    The normalized 14C concentrations in the liquid phase (Fig. 11) shows accumulation of dissolved 14C at each leading edge of a saturation front, as the radionuclide is scrapped from the gas phase. Concentrations are lower in the tail of each plume where 14C has been washed out. This is specifically evident in the panel of Fig. 11 that shows the distribution after 3 years.

    The relative 3H concentrations in the liquid phase are shown in Fig. 12. It is immediately evident that the reduction of the 3H inventory in the waste vaults is predominantly due to radioactive decay rather than migration out for the containment system. The distributions after 12 and 24 years (corresponding to the passage of 1 and 2 half-lives), show the expected 3H relative concentrations of 0.5 and 0.25, respectively. The arrival of the initial water pulse and saturation of the waste (mainly driven by capillarity) result in a ring-shape region within the waste of increased 3H concentration. This structure, however, should not be over-interpreted, as the assumption of a homogenized waste form is most likely unrealistic.

    Fig. 13 shows the change in the total activity of 3H and 14C in the waste vaults and in the vadose zone, relative to the initial conditions. As mentioned above, the change of 3H inventory in the vault declines following the exponential curve describing radioactive decay. The amount of activity from 3H in the vadose zone is comparatively small. Fig. 14 indicates that comparatively small amounts of 3H are transported to the water table at an initial rate on the order of 1010 Bq·yr-1 per waste vault. This rate declines with time due to radioactive decay of the source.

    By contrast, due to its long half-life of 14C, all the changes seen in the vault indicate the cumulative amount of 14C that escaped the waste and vault, initially mainly due to gas diffusion, and later by reduced diffusion to the shadow zone and advective transport in the liquid phase. The release rate of 14C is almost linear after the initial transient response to the arrival of the first liquid pulse. This is also confirmed by an essentially constant amount of 14C in the vadose zone, indicating near-steady transport of 14C through the natural system. The same conclusion can be reached by looking at the flux of 14C across the water table (see Fig. 14), which remains constant after the initial pulse. Gaseous releases to the atmosphere are smaller by a factor of about 106. From 10 year onward, a 14C release rate of approximately 1013 Bq·yr-1 is obtained per vault. Assuming this rate remains constant, less than 1% of the initial 14C inventory will be released from the repository during the compliance period of 300 years.

    3.4 Case D

    In this case, the scenario is examined where both engineered barrier systems have degraded. This may be considered a worst-case scenario even though the benefits of high liquid saturations around the vaults on diffusive 14C releases has been demonstrated in case C.

    Fig. 15 shows the evolution of relative 14C concentrations in the gas phase. Similar to the previous case, 14C is initially released by gas diffusion and spreads through a significant portion of the vadose zone. After approximately 5 years, however, the infiltration front engulfs the vaults, effectively limiting gas diffusion, with the exception of the region beneath the vault floor, where a shadow zone develops. Since no lowpermeability concrete vault is present, the waste saturates after about 10 years, and the shadow zone disappears, curtailing all gas diffusion. After this initial period, a quasi-steady state is achieved, where 14C is washed out of the vaults by water dissolving the adsorbed 14C mass and transporting it towards the water table.

    Fig. 16 shows the evolution of relative log(3H) concentrations in the liquid phase. During the initial few years, 3H is essentially immobile. Only after the water pulse arrives is 3H transported by advection to the water table. The concen-trations of 3H arriving at the water table reach a maximum at around 12 years, when infiltration fluxes are at quasi-steady state and the 3H as a source in the vaults has not yet decayed or been washed out. After 2, 3, and 4 half-lives, the concentration fluxes decrease exponentially, as expected.

    Fig. 17 succinctly summarizes the case where engineered barriers fail. At early times, releases of radioactivity are dominated by 14C, which is transported to the atmosphere and the water table mainly by gas diffusion. After gas diffusion is severely suppressed by the increased liquid saturation throughout the model domain, 14C is dissolved and advectively transported in the aqueous phase; after approximately 10 years, both release fluxes reach a quasisteady state at lower rates.

    The first arrival of 3H at the water table is around 7 years. Activity fluxes to the water table show a sharp arrival front, which coincides with the water pulse from infiltration, which has been interrupted by the construction of the repository and cover system. The sharp rise in 3H activity flux to the water table is curtailed after about 12 years, when the source term becomes weaker due to decay and depletion. No 3H escapes to the atmosphere. Peak activity releases to the water table are due to 3H after about 12 years.

    As shown in and Fig. 18, the very large 14C inventory is slowly depleted by wash-out and some gas diffusion at an approximately constant rate of 3×1012 Bq·yr-1 per vault.

    Absent disruptive events, approximately 1015 Bq of 14C will be leased within a compliance period of 300 years, which is less than 1% of the initial inventory. These estimates strongly depend on the release and mobilization processes within the waste and vaults, and the phase-partitioning properties, which are highly uncertain.

    The 3H inventory initially follows the exponential decay curve. After about 5 years, inventory reduction speeds up as the washed-out of 3H is initiated. After about 20 years, most of the 3H initially placed in the vaults is washed out or has decayed; the activity change curve reaches a constant value that is equal to the initial 3H activity of 1.35×1016 Bq stored in the vaults.

    4. Conclusions

    From case A with intact engineered barriers, gas diffusion is the main release mechanism of 14C which spreads throughout the shadow zone due to gas diffusion. The highsaturation plume at the edge of the repository prevents lateral spreading of 14C in the gas phase. Percolating water and wet layers in cover system limit diffusive 14C releases to the atmosphere. 3H migration is limited due to small advective and diffusive flows in the aqueous phase. Most 3H mass decays while being contained in the repository. There are no 3H releases to the atmosphere or water table.

    From the degraded concrete vault case, diffusive releases of 14C are accelerated due to absence of concrete vault. 14C release is effectively curtailed by increased liquid saturations in the vicinity of the vaults in no engineered cover barrier system release rate of 14C is approximately 1013 Bq·yr-1 per vault. Less than 1% of the initial 14C inventory will be released from the repository during the compliance period of 300 years. 3H is essentially contained in the repository. Its inventory follows the exponential curve that describes radioactive decay.

    From the result of case D, the waste is almost fully saturated after 10 years, effectively reducing gas diffusion. Dissolved 14C is washed out by advective transport in the aqueous phase at a constant rate of approximately 3×1012 Bq·yr-1 per vault. 3H is washed out by advective transport in approximately 20 years. Peak activity releases to the water table are due to 3H after about 12 years.

    The mobilization mechanism of radionuclides within the vaults is essentially unknown. While the chosen as-sumptions are expected to lead to conservative results, the source term, which drives transport in the near field, remains highly speculative. It is therefore recommended to develop a detailed source-term model that accounts for the composition and geometry of the waste, along with submodels on hydro-geochemical processes and scenarios on breaching mechanisms.

    Concentrations of both radionuclides in the gas and liquid phase depend on the assumptions about adsorption and phase partitioning coefficients, which are highly uncertain. The properties need to be characterized for a reliable estimation of phase partitioning behavior. Phase partitioning is essential because it determines the transport mechanism (diffusion, advection, and potential retardation) of the radionuclides as well as the absolute concentrations (and thus activity) of the fluids migrating to the accessible environment. It is expected that this study will provide a good way to predict the movement of radionuclides in terms of the safety of the disposal facility. This can be considered as a methodology for radionuclide transfer in the long-term as well as operation of the disposal facility. In particular, it seems that the direction of future radioactive waste management was indirectly suggested by using a method that considers both gaseous and liquid leakage.


    This work was supported by the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant funded by the Korea government Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (No.20193210100060), South Korea.



    Initial conditions for transport simulations; figures are identical for each radionuclide in each of the considered phases.


    Case A: Evolution of relative 14C concentrations in the gas phase (color) and liquid saturation (contour lines).


    Cas e A : Evolutio n o f relativ e log(3H ) concentration s i n th e liqui d phas e (colo r) an d liqui d saturatio n (contou r lines).


    Case A: Change of radionuclide activity in vaults and vadose zone with respect to initial inventory.


    Case A: Activity fluxes to atmosphere and water table.


    Case B: Evolution of relative 14C concentrations in the gas phase (color) and liquid saturation (contour lines).


    Case B: Evolution of relative log(3H) concentrations in the liquid phase (color) and liquid saturation (contour lines).


    Case B: Change of radionuclide activity in vaults and vadose zone with respect to initial inventory.


    Case B: Activity fluxes to atmosphere and water table.


    Case C: Evolution of relative 14C concentrations in the gas phase (color) and liquid saturation (contour lines).


    Case C: Evolution of relative 14C concentrations in the liquid phase (color) and liquid saturation (contour lines).


    Case C: Evolution of relative 3H concentrations in the liquid phase (color) and liquid saturation (contour lines).


    Case C: Change of radionuclide activity in vaults and vadose zone with respect to initial inventory.


    Case C: Activity fluxes to atmosphere and water table.


    Case D: Evolution of relative 14C concentrations in the gas phase (color) and liquid saturation (contour lines).


    Case D: Evolution of relative log(3H) concentrations in the liquid phase (color) and liquid saturation (contour lines).


    Case D: Change of radionuclide activity in vaults and vadose zone with respect to initial inventory.


    Case D: Activity fluxes to atmosphere and water table.


    Radioactive properties and inventory

    Main simulation scenarios


    1. G. Gee and D. Hillel, Groundwater recharge in arid re gions: review and critique of estimation methods , Hy drol. Process., 2(3), 255-266 (1988).
    2. G. Allison, G. Gee, and S. Tyler, Vadose-zone tech niques for estimating groundwater recharge in arid and semiarid regions , Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 58(1), 6-14 (1994).
    3. J. Ha, J. Lee, and J. Yoon, Simulation of unsaturat ed fluid flow on the 2nd phase facility at the Wolsong LILW disposal center , J. Nuel. Fuel Cycle Waste Tech nol., 15(3), 219-230 (2017).
    4. C.B. Haukwa. AMESH A Mesh Creating Program for the Integral Finite Difference Method, Lawrence Berke ley National Laboratory Report, LBNL-45284 (1998).
    5. K. Pruess, C. Oldenburg, and G. Moridis. TOUGH2 User s Guide Version 2.1, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Report, 175-196, LBNL-43134 (2012).
    6. Tecplot. 360 User s manual, Release 1, Tecplot,Inc., Bellevue, WA (2013).
    7. R.J. Millington and J.P. Quirk, Permeability of porous solids , Trans. Faraday Soc., 57, 1200-1207 (1961).
    8. G. Gee, P. Wierenga, B. Andraski, M. Young, M. Fayer, and M. Rockhold, Variations in water balance and re charge potential at three western sites , Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 58(1), 63-72 (1994).
    9. D.E. Daniel, Surface barriers: Problem, solutions, and future needs , Proc. of 33rd Hanford Symp. on health and the environment: symposium on in-situ remedia tion scientific basis for current and future technologies, 441-478, WA, Richland (1994).
    10. W. Henry, Experiments on the quantity of gases ab sorbed by water, at different temperatures, and under different pressures , Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., 93, 29- 274 (1803).
    11. S. Finsterle. iTOUGH2 User s Guide, Lawrence Berke ley National Laboratory Report, LBNL-40040 (2017).
    12. J.H. Lee, H. Jung, S.W. Park, J.Y. Cheong, S.J. Park, and C.H. Lee, Evaluation of percolation rate of bed rock aquifer in coastal area , J. Nuel. Fuel Cycle Waste Technol., 14(1), 21-33 (2016).
    1. SEARCH
    2. JNFCWT

      Online Submission

    3. Korean Radioactive
      Waste Society (KRS)

    4. Editorial Office
      Contact Information

      - Tel: +82-42-861-5851, 866-4205
      - Fax: +82-42-861-5852
      - E-mail: